Concerned About Bias in Mediation?
Mediation is intended to be a neutral process where all parties are treated fairly, respectfully, and without prejudice. When concerns arise regarding a mediator’s conduct, impartiality, or professionalism, those concerns deserve to be documented and examined through appropriate channels.
This page serves as a public record of allegations and reported concerns regarding mediator Nathan Majors and certain participants involved in a Texas mediation matter. The information presented reflects allegations, opinions, experiences, and observations reported by parties involved in the case.
Hear Nathan Majors in His Own Words
Racism & Profanity is NEVER acceptable.
Why Fair and Impartial Mediation Matters
Mediation often plays a critical role in resolving disputes involving personal injury claims, insurance matters, business conflicts, family issues, and other legal proceedings. Participants rely on mediators to facilitate discussions without bias and to ensure that all parties are treated equally, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, cultural background, or personal appearance.
The integrity of the mediation process depends on neutrality, professionalism, and public confidence. Any conduct that appears to undermine those principles can raise legitimate concerns.
Reported Concerns
The allegations documented on this page include concerns regarding:
- Alleged biased or discriminatory comments during or relating to mediation
- Questions regarding neutrality and impartiality
- Alleged conduct that may have created fear or pressure during settlement discussions
- Professional conduct concerns involving mediation participants
- Statements and actions that allegedly undermined confidence in the mediation process
Insurance Dispute Background
According to the reporting party, a personal injury matter involving AAA Insurance and Progressive Insurance initially resulted in settlement offers that were substantially below what was ultimately offered later in the litigation process.
It is alleged that:
- AAA Insurance initially offered $0 during mediation.
- Progressive Insurance initially offered $21,000.
- Following subsequent litigation developments and additional proceedings, settlement discussions reportedly increased to approximately $42,000.
- The reporting party contends that the increase occurred after significant developments in the case and after arguments presented during the initial mediation were challenged.
The reporting party believes these developments demonstrate that the original valuation of the claim was unfair and that the claimant was not initially treated fairly during the settlement process.
Allegations Regarding Mediation Conduct
The reporting party further alleges that comments attributed to mediator Nathan Majors raised concerns about bias and impartiality.
According to the allegations, statements were communicated regarding how a lawyer’s appearance, including a beard associated with religious identity, might be perceived in Rockwall County, Texas. The reporting party contends that such remarks referenced community attitudes toward a proposed mosque and created concerns that race, religion, ethnicity, or cultural identity were being introduced into settlement discussions.
If accurately reported, the reporting party believes such comments would be inconsistent with the expectations of neutrality and fairness that participants should be able to expect during mediation.
These allegations have not been independently verified by this website.
Hear Nathan Majors in His Own Words
Respect and impartiality are fundamental to mediation. The statements presented here raise serious concerns about professional conduct.
Concerns Regarding Other Participants
According to the reporting party, attorney Jack H. LeCrone of Fee Smith & Sharp LLP was aware of comments allegedly made during mediation that raised concerns about fairness and impartiality. The reporting party further alleges that AAA Insurance initially offered $0 during mediation before later increasing its position.
The reporting party also raises concerns regarding Progressive Insurance’s in-house attorney, Joselito Vladimir Giron. According to the reporting party, actions taken during the mediation process contributed to concerns about transparency, professionalism, and the handling of settlement negotiations.
These statements reflect the allegations and opinions of the reporting party and have not been independently verified.
Our Position
We believe mediation should be impartial, respectful, professional, and free from discrimination. Allegations of bias, prejudice, misconduct, or unethical behavior should be reviewed fairly and objectively through appropriate legal and professional channels.
Every participant deserves equal treatment under the law and equal access to a mediation process that is based on fairness, integrity, and accountability.
Submit Information
If you have firsthand, truthful, and documented information relevant to concerns regarding mediation conduct, fairness, discrimination, or professional ethics, you may submit your information for review.
Supporting documentation may include correspondence, court filings, mediation records, witness statements, or other materials that help verify reported events.
Expose Bias in Mediation
Have you witnessed or experienced bias during mediation? Share your story and upload any supporting evidence. Whether your concerns involve favoritism, discrimination, conflicts of interest, procedural unfairness, or unethical conduct, your report can help promote transparency and accountability. Please provide as much detail as possible and attach any relevant documents, emails, recordings, or other materials that support your submission.
